Enhancing Indeed's User Experience

Course: Usability

How to improve the Indeed website's user experience for job seekers?

Project Overview

Enhancing UX with a Usability Study

TLDR - About the Opportunity

Indeed is one of the most widely used tools for job searching all around the world. However, its competition with platforms such as LinkedIn necessitates superseding user expectations around strong online communities for networking and staying on top of industry trends. It also requires a UX strategy that helps job-seekers filter, complete and track applications conveniently.

Team & Role

UX Methods I Used

I worked as a Project Manager & UX Researcher alongside Logan, Stephanie and Siqi.

• Heuristic Analysis
• Competitive Analysis
• Task Analysis with Post-Task Interviews

Tools

Timeline

Figma, Qualtrics, Excel

Spring 2023 (February to April)

Goals

Identify pain points in inputting information to create a resume

Determine whether users can accomplish job search tasks easily

Determine whether iconography is sufficient for communication with all users

Objectives

Assess usability of tasks as compared to results of heuristic evaluation

Assess general usability of applicant flows

Understand users' thought process and mental status while job searching and applying

Project Roadmap

01

Project Scope

Define project objectives
Form a schedule + designate responsibilities
Competitive research

02

Heuristic Evaluation

Framework and severity levels
Examination of user flows
Debrief session

03

Usability Tests & Interviews

Screener survey
Participant recruitment + scheduling
Tasks & test script
Success metrics
Task analysis with think aloud protocol
Follow-up questions

04

Data Analysis
& Benchmarks

Thematic analysis
Quantify success metrics
Debrief session
Prioritize pain points
Actionable recommendations

Main Contributions Summarized

My contributions to the project management and UX research were as follows:

Heuristic Evaluation

I used the Nielsen Norman Group’s 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design to analyze whether the website's usability complied with industry standards. The following severity key was used to prioritize issues according to level of urgency.

#1

Issues

When resetting the password, there are no tips on what a strong password is.

Recommendations

Give suggestions for creating a new password and allow users to see the new password as they type in the text box. Otherwise, errors would make them go through the flow again.

Severity Rating

#2

Auto-Text Boxes

These auto-text boxes are all over the platform but they don't give suggestions until the user types something.
Most have a one-word heading at the top.

Recommendations

1. Give suggestions in case of a typing error, such as "Oh hey, you typed Aistin. Did you mean Austin"?
2.  Add a dropdown menu to show all potential entries when the user has typed nothing.
3. Have explanations around the text boxes to show examples of what can be entered.

Severity Rating

#1

Search Results Page

The left side of the screen shows a list of jobs, and the right side shows the full details of a selected job listing. A user may be confused because the scrolling no longer aligns once both sides of screen are in use.

Recommendations

Create a tool where expanding a job description could add it to a list on the right side as jobs you’d want to consider applying to, rather than leaving those specs up despite not seeing the main job listing anymore.

Severity Rating

#2

Filters

The filters on Indeed have several positives:
1. Thoughtful categories ensure alignment with user preferences (e.g., salary, location).
2. Certification levels displayed for clarity, improving usability.
3. Automatic application of relevant certifications for more accurate search results.
4. Specialized fields available for professions like nursing, catering to specific interests.

Severity Rating

#1

Filters for Job Search

The filters  for categorizing jobs by date, location, distance, job type and so on are only visible after the user conducts a search by entering a job title and location.

Moreover, the Indeed website does not have methods for sorting jobs by visa status or citizenship, making job searches for relevant groups more painstaking.

Recommendations

Show the filters that currently appear after a job search on the home page. Add filters that might be relevant to people with diverging citizenship and visa statuses.

Severity Rating

#2

Job Description

The order in which information for job descriptions has been listed mimics that of a newspaper ad leading to a mental model that is familiar to most people.The information is also arranged so that the user has access to the most relevant information such as job title, company, location and salary information at the top with details of responsibilities and qualifications at the bottom.

Severity Rating

#1

“Apply Now” Button

The “apply now” button opens the linked page in a new tab. A user may not notice they are in a new tab and struggle to go back.

Recommendations

Open the page in the same tab, and it allows user to use back button to go to the previous page.

Severity Rating

#2

Keyboard Shortcuts

For desktop designs, one shouldn't assume users will know that they can use a keyboard shortcut. It’s a good idea to give users a visible option to undo an action on the UI. The redo button is available in the edit menu on job applications.

Severity Rating

#3

Message Window

Like in a physical space, exits should be easy to find and well signposted so that they will be discovered when needed. However, the message window doesn’t have an exit button. A user would have to click the black area to close the message window.

Recommendations

Add an “X” button to close the window and create obvious signage for users.

Severity Rating

#1

Redundant Information

The following features are repeated unnecessarily on the home page:
Buttons to post a resume, post a job, to browse salaries and company reviews.

Recommendations

Conduct competitive research and user testing to understand the most relevant location for CTAs and redesign for minimalism.

Severity Rating

#2

Excessive Verbiage

Homepage elements are excessively wordy. This can overwhelm users and create an unpleasant user experience.

Recommendations

Most of these can be reduced to links/buttons of 1-3 words e.g. “Indeed también está disponible en español” can simply read “Español.”

Severity Rating

Competitive Research

#What is the landscape of job search websites like? What are the pros & cons of direct & indirect competitors?

To answer these questions, 10 websites were analyzed. The details of the direct and indirect competitors thus audited are given below:

The competitive research uncovered the following opportunities Indeed can adopt and ideas it should avoid to improve the overall user experience and functionality of the website. It taps into the needs of an ever-evolving and diverse economy.

Task-by-Task Analysis

Participant Recruitment

Since Indeed is an international platform, I wanted to focus on users from diverse national and linguistic backgrounds. I also wanted to test with users with varying levels of experience with online job search. I created a screener survey, which was later disseminated through my team's social media and professional channels.

#Study Participants

Participants aged 26 and above
People with commercial health insurance and/or a pharmacy benefits plan
People using smart health devices on a regular/semi-regular basis or purchasing within 6 months
All states, gender identities, household incomes and ethnicities, with a focus on Hispanic origin

Testing Packet

#Screener Survey

Since Indeed is an international platform, I wanted to focus on users from diverse national and linguistic backgrounds. I also wanted to test with users with varying levels of experience navigating job searching online. I created a screener survey, which was later disseminated through my team's social media and professional channels.

I assesswhich aspects of users' identities and circumstances impacted their criteria and methods for job searching online. My questions revolved around most used platforms for job search and relevant obstacles (such as unstable internet, dependents and educational background) and criteria for jobs (e.g. location, field and salary). Additionally, I inquired about gender, age, ethnicity and relevant accommodations for people with disabilities to ensure a diverse user group, while refraining from asking for sensitive information.

Link to Screener Survey

#Moderator Script

For standardization in user testing and interviews, I created a moderator script outlining the exact instructions and questions my team members must ask their interviewees. The testing prioritized user flows that were either crucial or discovered as problematic during the heuristic evaluation to validate internal findings.

Link to Moderator script

Key Metrics

94.9%

Completion Rate

Across all tasks, users were completed nearly 95% of tasks. There were isolated incidents of a participant not completing a task, which led us to uncovering an additional usability issue.

15.3%

Frustration Rate

Across all tasks and participants, users were 15.3% likely to experience frustrations while working on a task. Frustration with a task did not necessarily mean a incompletion of the task, but being unable to complete the task had a strong overlap with experiencing frustration.

83.9%

Success Rate

We defined success in this study by calculating the likelihood that a user would complete a task (total completion rate) without experiencing frustrations (total frustration rate).

Table of Findings

A color-coded tabular summary of our findings for each task and participant is given below:

Task 1
Task 2

Task 1

Using your own preference or method, search for accounting jobs.

Objective

Establish a baseline of user’s default habits within job searching and evaluate Indeed’s likelihood of being utilized among users in the market.

Issues:

• Onboarding issue; not knowing what all features Indeed offers
• Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.

Recommendations

• Market the product and it’s features better.
• Option to change and choose language
• Making it more competitive with other standards like LinkedIn and Google Jobs (lacking a lot of features, such as the community component)

100%

Completion Rate

0%

Frustration Rate

100%

Success Rate
  • The onboarding does not educate users about all the features Indeed has to offer.
  • The language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.
  • Market the product and its features better.
  • Provide the option to change and choose language.
  • Make the platform more competitive with other standards like LinkedIn and Google Jobs (lacking a lot of features).

Task 2:

Select the first job upon your search and save this job for later.

Objective:

Observe how users conduct a simple search within Indeed’s platform, assess user interactions with iconography within the site.

Key Issues:

• Iconography is not consistent and hidden in some cases within the 3 dots menu
• Two panel design is confusing to navigate.
• Notifications can be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.

Recommendations

• Keep iconography consistent and readily available. Add a hover state or buttons with text for clarity.
• Toggling between card sizes and two row/single row views.
• Options to open jobs in popups or new pages.
• Improve system feedback with more information .

100%

Completion Rate

22.2%

Frustration Rate

77.8%

Success Rate
  • Iconography is not clear. The save jobs button is hidden within 3 dots menu. It also changed during the research from a heart icon to a bookmark icon.
  • The feature for saving jobs does not give feedback to users about whether a job has been saved. Notifications can also be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.
  • There is no hover state or alternative text.
  • The number of applicants are missing on the job listing page.
  • Users can only open job listing page from the left side panel.
  • Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.
  • Iconography is not clear. The save jobs button is hidden within 3 dots menu. It also changed during the research from a heart icon to a bookmark icon.
  • The feature for saving jobs does not give feedback to users about whether a job has been saved. Notifications can also be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.
  • There is no hover state or alternative text.
  • The number of applicants are missing on the job listing page.
  • Users can only open job listing page from the left side panel.
  • Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.

Task 3:

Apply for the job you saved from Task 2 from your saved jobs list.

Objective

Understand a user’s thought process in exploring the profile options and finding out what happened to the listing on being saved.

Issues:

• Cannot remove expired jobs.
• Hard to find the saved jobs section.

Recommendations

• Make saved jobs area easier to find.
• Show user image or initials instead of profile icon to add a personal factor.
• Option to remove expired jobs from saved jobs.

100%

Completion Rate

11.1%

Frustration Rate

88.9%

Success Rate
  • Cannot remove expired jobs.
  • Hard to find the saved jobs section.
  • Loved the tracking system in saved jobs sections.
Task 3
Task 5
Task 6

Task 1

Using your own preference or method, search for accounting jobs.

Objective

Establish a baseline of user’s default habits within job searching and evaluate Indeed’s likelihood of being utilized among users in the market.

Issues:

• Onboarding issue; not knowing what all features Indeed offers
• Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.

Recommendations

• Market the product and it’s features better.
• Option to change and choose language
• Making it more competitive with other standards like LinkedIn and Google Jobs (lacking a lot of features, such as the community component)

100%

Completion Rate

0%

Frustration Rate

100%

Success Rate
  • The onboarding does not educate users about all the features Indeed has to offer.
  • The language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.
  • Market the product and its features better.
  • Provide the option to change and choose language.
  • Make the platform more competitive with other standards like LinkedIn and Google Jobs (lacking a lot of features).

Task 2:

Select the first job upon your search and save this job for later.

Objective:

Observe how users conduct a simple search within Indeed’s platform, assess user interactions with iconography within the site.

Key Issues:

• Iconography is not consistent and hidden in some cases within the 3 dots menu
• Two panel design is confusing to navigate.
• Notifications can be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.

Recommendations

• Keep iconography consistent and readily available. Add a hover state or buttons with text for clarity.
• Toggling between card sizes and two row/single row views.
• Options to open jobs in popups or new pages.
• Improve system feedback with more information .

100%

Completion Rate

22.2%

Frustration Rate

77.8%

Success Rate
  • Iconography is not clear. The save jobs button is hidden within 3 dots menu. It also changed during the research from a heart icon to a bookmark icon.
  • The feature for saving jobs does not give feedback to users about whether a job has been saved. Notifications can also be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.
  • There is no hover state or alternative text.
  • The number of applicants are missing on the job listing page.
  • Users can only open job listing page from the left side panel.
  • Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.
  • Iconography is not clear. The save jobs button is hidden within 3 dots menu. It also changed during the research from a heart icon to a bookmark icon.
  • The feature for saving jobs does not give feedback to users about whether a job has been saved. Notifications can also be added for saved jobs to show where they are kept.
  • There is no hover state or alternative text.
  • The number of applicants are missing on the job listing page.
  • Users can only open job listing page from the left side panel.
  • Language on the page is confusing for users who are not native English speakers.

Task 3:

Apply for the job you saved from Task 2 from your saved jobs list.

Objective

Understand a user’s thought process in exploring the profile options and finding out what happened to the listing on being saved.

Issues:

• Cannot remove expired jobs.
• Hard to find the saved jobs section.

Recommendations

• Make saved jobs area easier to find.
• Show user image or initials instead of profile icon to add a personal factor.
• Option to remove expired jobs from saved jobs.

100%

Completion Rate

11.1%

Frustration Rate

88.9%

Success Rate
  • Cannot remove expired jobs.
  • Hard to find the saved jobs section.
  • Loved the tracking system in saved jobs sections.

Task 5:

Convert your old resume to an Indeed résumé.

100%

Completion Rate

0%

Frustration Rate

100%

Success Rate

Task 5 Issues:

  • It is difficult to find the relevant feature inside the profile.
  • Users are usually not sure what an “Indeed Resume” means.
  • User kept going to the “Résumé Help Centre”. Additionally, the main CTA on the above page is “Start Résumé Review” not about uploading or creating resume.

Task 6:

Upload your résumé to Indeed, then add it to your profile.

71.4%

Completion Rate

57.1%

Frustration Rate

20%

Success Rate

Task 6 Issues:

  • An upload new option doesn’t exist.
  • The replace option is hard to find.
  • Users do not have the option to upload multiple résumés for a customizable job search.
  • Deleting a résumé doesn’t show the option to upload a new version.
  • The see results page is confusing and takes users to an advertisement for résumé review.

Conclusion

Key Recommendations

Marketing and user understanding of Indeed's features can be improved through clear onboarding.

Include LinkedIn and Facebook API to let users leverage professional network, or create a component that plugs in to alumni resources.

Make the resume writing center distinguishable from the resume upload option.

Ensure that users can differentiate between the two panels.  Allow users to open jobs in new tabs or overlays to see full details from the right panel.  

Lessons Learned

Revising the screener survey according to ethical guidelines helped in cultivating language that respected participant choice, privacy and dignity.

Competitor benchmarking, which was later validated through usability testing, was crucial for identifying the social aspect of career development.

Accounting for diverse user identities and backgrounds led to a more nuanced understanding of the preferences and needs relevant to job searching.

You May Also Like

User Research. Accessible Redesign.

CapMetro

Making public transit accessible for people with visual disabilities

UX Research. UX Design. Product Strategy

Last Minute

Simplifying third-party transactions via a community- based ticketing platform